DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
111999P.pdf 05/14/2012 United States v. Salvador Mendoza
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 11-1999
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport
[PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Beam and Bye, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - criminal law and sentencing. Officers had probable
cause to conduct a Fourth Amendment seizure based on defendant's
erratic driving and traffic violations; having made a lawful stop, officers
were justified in detaining defendant for a time reasonably necessary to
conduct a limited investigation; drug dog sniff did not extend the scope or
duration of the seizure and did not violate the Fourth Amendment; the
district court did not err in finding that, on balance, defendant's behavior
leading up to and including the warrantless search of his home was
consistent with a finding that he voluntarily consented to the search;
district court did not err in calculating drug quantity.