DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

111999P.pdf   05/14/2012  United States  v.  Salvador Mendoza
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-1999
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Beam and Bye, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - criminal law and sentencing. Officers had probable cause to conduct a Fourth Amendment seizure based on defendant's erratic driving and traffic violations; having made a lawful stop, officers were justified in detaining defendant for a time reasonably necessary to conduct a limited investigation; drug dog sniff did not extend the scope or duration of the seizure and did not violate the Fourth Amendment; the district court did not err in finding that, on balance, defendant's behavior leading up to and including the warrantless search of his home was consistent with a finding that he voluntarily consented to the search; district court did not err in calculating drug quantity.