DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

112270P.pdf   02/10/2012  United States  v.  Jason Clark
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-2270
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Murphy and Benton, Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - conviction. Sufficient evidence was presented to support
   conviction for aggravated identity theft and district court did not err in
   denying motion for acquittal on the aggravated identity theft, as a
   reasonable juror could infer that Clark had knowledge of the improper
   use of personal information of real people. District court did not abuse its
   discretion in admitting evidence under Rule 404(b) of prior identity theft
   convictions to show knowledge and intent.