DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

112404P.pdf   09/09/2013  United States  v.  Michael Abrahamson
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-2404
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
[PUBLISHED] [Per Curiam - Before Gruender, Benton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Sentencing. For the court's prior opinion, see United States v. Abrahamson, 685 F.3d 777 (8th Cir. 2012). On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States for further consideration in light of Alleyene v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 2151 (2013). Because the challenged enhancement to defendant's sentence was based solely on his prior drug felony conviction, it continues to fall under the recidivism exception to the jury presentation requirement that the Supreme Court recognized in Almendarez-Torres and left unchanged in Alleyne; as a result, the court affirms defendant's sentence and affirms his conviction for the reasons stated in the prior opinion. 112404P.pdf 07/23/2012 United States v. Michael Abrahamson U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 11-2404 U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Benton and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Speedy Trial Act claim rejected; defendant was not entitled to proposed "ultimate user" instruction since he was charged with conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine, rather than possession of the drug, and even if could show he was the ultimate user within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. Sec. 833(c)(3), that would not constitute a defense to the charge; Sixth Amendment challenge to statutory mandatory minimum rejected.