DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

112602P.pdf   07/05/2012  United States  v.  Barry Vincent Ardolf
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-2602
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Chief Judge, Author, with Wollman and Smith,
   Circuit Judges]
   Criminal Case - sentence. In appeal of 216-month sentence, district
   court did not abused its discretion in applying enhancement for
   obstruction of justice based on defendant's instructions on their testimony
   and letters to the court and in his perjury when attempting to withdraw his
   guilty plea. District court did not err in finding ten images of child
   pornography on defendant's computer. Sentence was not substantively
   unreasonable.