112646P.pdf   07/12/2012  Gary Cox  v.  Mortgage Electronic
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-2646
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Bright and Murphy, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Consumer law. Because plaintiffs have not shown why
   discovery is not an adequate remedy, the district court did not err in
   dismissing their count seeking a detailed accounting of the lender's
   activities with respect to their request for a forbearance or loan
   modification and an order seeking release of the loan file; homeowners
   failed to show any connections between the lenders' action and the
   fairness of the foreclosure sale and failed to state a claim under Minn.
   Stat. Sec. 580.06; plaintiffs failed to adequately plead a claim for breach
   of duty of good faith and fair dealing under the statute; plaintiffs failed to
   adequately plead a claim for misrepresentation and detrimental reliance.