DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

113009P.pdf   02/11/2013  IDT Corp  v.  AR Public Law Center
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-3009
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Texarkana   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Civil Procedure. The district court did not abuse its
   discretion by sealing sensitive business information contained in the
   complaint in this action as the potential harm in unsealing confidential
   and competitively sensitive information outweighed the moving party's
   generalized interest in access to the complaint; however, on the record
   before the court, there is not a sufficient explanation from the district
   court for this court to evaluate whether redaction was a reasonable
   alternative to sealing the entire complaint; as a result, the sealing order is
   vacated and the case remanded to permit the court to either explain why
   sealing of the entire pleading is warranted or to unseal a redacted version
   of the complaint.