DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

113255P.pdf   07/22/2013  United States  v.  Adrian Dunn
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-3255
                          and No:  11-3256
                          and No:  11-3257
                          and No:  11-3258
                          and No:  11-3318
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Shepherd, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law and sentencing. Evidence was sufficient to support defendants' conspiracy convictions; district court did not abuse its discretion in denying their motions in limine to exclude late-disclosed government witnesses as there was no showing the lateness of the disclosure caused any prejudice; when a witness testified to information not disclosed in the proffer statements provided defendants, the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying their motion for a mistrial; defendant Dunn's challenges to wiretap evidence rejected; any error in permitting witnesses to testify before the grand jury regarding calls was rendered harmless by the petit jury verdict; speedy trial argument rejected; searches of a garage and a car found on the premises described in the warrant were lawful; no error in imposing a two-level enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2D1.1(b)(1) for defendant Dunn's possession of a firearm in connection with the drug offense; no error in imposing the statutory minimum sentence on Dunn based on his Missouri drug conviction; defendant Dunn's challenge to a forfeiture ruling was untimely; district court did not commit plain error in submitting to the jury only the drug quantity alleged in defendant Miles' indictment or in imposing a sentence consistent with the jury's quantity finding; claim the prosecutor engaged in improper rebuttal during the closing argument for defendant Westbook's case rejected; limits on cross-examination of an agent did not deny defendant Moore a fair trial.