DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

113412P.pdf   03/25/2013  Iowa League of Cities  v.  EPA
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-3412
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Environmental Protection Administration   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Beam and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Petition for Review - Order of the EPA. Court finds it has jurisdiction over a petition for review seeking direct appellate review of two letters sent by the EPA to Senator Charles Grassley with respect to bacteria mixing zones and blending in wastewater treatment facilities as the EPA's letters constituted binding promulgations and effluent limitations under Section 509(b)(1)(E) of the Clean Water Act; the matter was ripe for judicial review because the dispute was not abstract and presented an actual hardship to the petitioners; petitioners had Article III standing to bring the claim; proper standard for review for these challenges to agency procedural compliance under Sec. 706(2)(D) of the Administrative Procedures Act was de novo review; the EPA violated the APA when it bypassed notice and comment procedures and announced new rules banning bacteria mixing zones in all waters designated for primary contact recreation, and the rule is vacated; similarly, the EPA violated the APA when it announced a new legislative rule with respect to blending peak wet water flows, and that rule is also vacated; EPA's new mixing zone rule is not obviously precluded by the plain meaning of any applicable Clean Water Act regulations and should the EPA wish to implement the rule, it may seek to do so using the appropriate procedures; however, the blending rule clearly exceeds the EPA's statutory authority and insofar as the rule imposes secondary treatment regulations on flows within facilities it must be vacated as exceeding the agency's statutory authority; petitioners' request for an award of litigation costs under Clean Water Act Sec. 509(b)(3) is denied.