DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
113530P.pdf 08/09/2013 Greg Herden v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 11-3530
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
[PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, for the Court En Banc]
Civil case - Federal Tort Claims Act. In a suit claiming plaintiffs'
cattle operations were damaged because of a seed mixture an employee of
the U.S. Department of Agriculture directed plaintiffs to use on their
property, the district court did not err in concluding the employee's
conduct fell within the Federal Tort Claims Act's discretionary function
exception. Judge Melloy, with whom Chief Judge Riley and Judge Shepherd
join, dissenting.
113530P.pdf 08/20/2012 Greg Herden v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 11-3530
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
[PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Bye,
Circuit Judge]
Civil case - Federal Tort Claims Act. In an action alleging a
government employee negligently caused death and illness within
plaintiffs' cattle herd by mandating a toxic plant mix on pasture land
enrolled in a conversation, the district court erred in granting the
government's motion for summary judgment; while the official's
selection of a seeding plan was discretionary, the decision was not based
on the kind of policy-based and economic-based factors Congress
intended to protect under the discretionary function exception. Judge Bye,
dissenting.