DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

113530P.pdf   08/09/2013  Greg Herden  v.  United States
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-3530
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
[PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, for the Court En Banc] Civil case - Federal Tort Claims Act. In a suit claiming plaintiffs' cattle operations were damaged because of a seed mixture an employee of the U.S. Department of Agriculture directed plaintiffs to use on their property, the district court did not err in concluding the employee's conduct fell within the Federal Tort Claims Act's discretionary function exception. Judge Melloy, with whom Chief Judge Riley and Judge Shepherd join, dissenting. 113530P.pdf 08/20/2012 Greg Herden v. United States U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 11-3530 U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Bye, Circuit Judge]
Civil case - Federal Tort Claims Act. In an action alleging a government employee negligently caused death and illness within plaintiffs' cattle herd by mandating a toxic plant mix on pasture land enrolled in a conversation, the district court erred in granting the government's motion for summary judgment; while the official's selection of a seeding plan was discretionary, the decision was not based on the kind of policy-based and economic-based factors Congress intended to protect under the discretionary function exception. Judge Bye, dissenting.