DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

113736P.pdf   05/02/2014  United States  v.  Samuel Ford
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-3736
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids   
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Loken and Benton, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. On remand from the United States Supreme Court for reconsideration in light of Burrage v. United States, 134 S.Ct. 881 (2014). For the court's prior opinion in the matter, see United States v. Ford, 717 F.3d 612 (8th Cir. 2013). The court again affirm Ford's conviction on Count II for distributing a mixture of cocaine and heroin; Ford's conviction on Count I for distributing heroin resulting in death is reversed as the government failed to prove that the drug Ford distributed to the deceased victim was a "but-for" cause of his death; because the jury unanimously found that Ford distributed heroin within 1,000 feet of a school, the district court is directed to enter judgment on the lesser included offense of distributing a controlled substance within 1,000 feet of a protected location, and the case is remanded for resentencing. 113736P.pdf 06/20/2013 United States v. Samuel Ford U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 11-3736 U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Cedar Rapids [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Loken and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Criminal case - Criminal law. Evidence was sufficient to support defendant's conviction for knowingly and intentionally distributing a mix of heroin causing death; the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion for new trial based on an alleged Brady violation as there was no Brady violation; court could not conduct a meaningful review of defendant's claim regarding a ruling on a motion in limine concerning prior bad acts evidence in the absence of a transcript of the hearing on the motion, and defendant's supplemental brief on the issue is stricken.