DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

113860P.pdf   04/19/2013  Juan Martinez Carcamo  v.  Eric H. Holder, Jr.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  11-3860
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Colloton and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Petition for Review - Immigration. Assuming petitioners' accounts of the ICE officers' conduct are true, any Fourth Amendment violations they suffered were not sufficiently egregious to entitle them to the remedy they seek - exclusion of decisive evidence in their civil removal proceeding; while both the IJ and the BIA erred in their treatment of petitioners' testimony, the errors did not require a remand because they were not prejudicial since they were relevant only to petitioners' Fourth Amendment claims and did not go to the factual finding upon which they were removed - namely, that they are aliens who entered the U.S. without proper admission; the court had no jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1252 over petitioners' claim that the IJ deprived them of due process by failing to shift the burden of proof once they made a prima facie case of a Fourth Amendment violation as they had failed to raise the issue at the administrative level.