121083P.pdf   02/25/2013  Melvin Folkerts  v.  City of Waverly
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1083
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Waterloo   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Loken and Smith, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Civil rights. Even if defendant police officer violated
   plaintiffs' mentally-impaired son's fundamental rights during the
   investigation of an allegation that the son had engaged in criminal
   behavior, the officer was entitled to summary judgment because the
   violation does not shock the conscience as the record showed the officer
   altered his questioning style, more fully explained the son's Miranda
   rights, interviewed him in a less-intimidating setting and called the
   plaintiffs and invited them to the station for the questioning; nor did the
   adequacy of the investigation shock the conscience; plaintiffs failed to
   show the investigation was retaliatory; decision to charge the son did not
   shock the conscience; where the individual officer's actions did not
   support a Section 1983 action, there can be no city liability for failure to
   train; with respect to plaintiffs' ADA claims, no reasonable jury could
   conclude that defendants failed to make reasonable accommodations for
   the son's disability.