DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

121294P.pdf   03/28/2013  United States  v.  Neil Havlik
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1294
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Smith,
   Circuit Judge]
   Criminal case - Criminal law. Defendant's statements to interrogating
   officers were not an unequivocal or unambiguous request for counsel, 
   and the police were not required to ask clarifying questions; defendant's
   waiver of his Miranda rights was voluntary, and the district court did 
   not err in denying his motion to suppress his statements; district court
   did not err in declining to give an entrapment instruction; evidence was 
   sufficient to prove the jurisdictional element of the child pornography
   charges against defendant; claim of ineffective assistance of counsel 
   should be raised in a habeas action.