121383P.pdf   06/03/2013  James Bradshaw  v.  FFE Transportation Services, I
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1383
                          and No:  12-2161
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Wollman and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
   Civil case - Torts. District court did not abuse its discretion by deciding
   defendants had waived their objections to plaintiff's medical witnesses by
   failing to make these objections at the time set in the district court's
   discovery scheduling order; nor did the court err in declining to reopen
   discovery after declaring a mistrial in the first trial; no error, under the
   circumstances of the case, in allowing a doctor to use undisclosed
   anatomical drawings at the second trial as the court properly limited
   testimony on the drawings and gave the jury an instruction that the
   drawings did not amount to substantive evidence; defendants did not
   sufficiently articulate a Rule 26(a)(2)(B)(iii) objection to the drawings.