121674P.pdf   06/14/2013  Shirley Bell  v.  Pfizer
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1674
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff   
   [PUBLISHED] [Chief Judge Riley, Author, with Wollman and Melloy,
   Circuit Judges]
   Civil Case - diversity - products liability. The district court did 
   not err in determining product liability claims against brand defendants 
   failed as a matter of law because Bell stipulated she had not ingested a 
   product manufactured by the brand defendants. As for claims against the 
   generic manufacturer, the district court erred in dismissing all the claims 
   as failure to warn claims and thus preempted; dismissal of non-warning 
   design defect and breach of implied warranty claims are remanded to the 
   district court for further proceedings. The district court did not err in 
   concluding Bell could not state a viable claim based on Pliva's failure to 
   incorporate the 2004 change into its label under the learned intermediary 
   doctrine.