DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

121702P.pdf   06/28/2013  Fred Keller, Jr.  v.  City of Fremont
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1702
                          and No:  12-1705
                          and No:  12-1708
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Bright and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - Immigration and Nationality Act; Fair Housing Act. In facial challenge to Fremont, Nebraska ordinance, which limits providing rental housing to "illegal aliens" and "unauthorized aliens", the district court erred in concluding the provisions were preempted by the Immigration and Nationality Act. Ordinance does not have impermissible effect of "removing" a class of aliens from the city or intrude on the federally occupied "fields" of alien removal or alien registration or anti-harboring. As for conflict preemption, it would be speculative whether the rental provisions conflict with removal provisions of federal immigration law. In the Fair Housing Act claims, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Martinez Plaintiffs' motion to correct their oversight in failing to plead a disparate impact claim. The district court did not err in concluding Keller had standing as a landlord to assert a FHA claim. The district court erred in concluding the ordinance's rental provisions violated the FHA, as disparate impact claim was based solely on the effect an otherwise lawful ordinance may have on a subgroup of the unprotected class of aliens and does not violate the FHA. District court's rejection of claims that ordinance violated state law is affirmed. Judge Colloton concurs in the judgment on the FHA issue. Judge Bright dissents on the preemption issue.