DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
121702P.pdf 06/28/2013 Fred Keller, Jr. v. City of Fremont
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-1702
and No: 12-1705
and No: 12-1708
U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Bright and Colloton, Circuit Judges]
Civil Case - Immigration and Nationality Act; Fair Housing Act. In facial
challenge to Fremont, Nebraska ordinance, which limits providing rental
housing to "illegal aliens" and "unauthorized aliens", the district court
erred in concluding the provisions were preempted by the Immigration and
Nationality Act. Ordinance does not have impermissible effect of
"removing" a class of aliens from the city or intrude on the federally
occupied "fields" of alien removal or alien registration or
anti-harboring. As for conflict preemption, it would be speculative
whether the rental provisions conflict with removal provisions of federal
immigration law. In the Fair Housing Act claims, the district court did
not abuse its discretion in denying the Martinez Plaintiffs' motion to
correct their oversight in failing to plead a disparate impact claim. The
district court did not err in concluding Keller had standing as a landlord
to assert a FHA claim. The district court erred in concluding the
ordinance's rental provisions violated the FHA, as disparate impact claim
was based solely on the effect an otherwise lawful ordinance may have on a
subgroup of the unprotected class of aliens and does not violate the FHA.
District court's rejection of claims that ordinance violated state law is
affirmed. Judge Colloton concurs in the judgment on the FHA issue. Judge
Bright dissents on the preemption issue.