DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
121786P.pdf 04/26/2013 Smith Flooring v. Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-1786
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
[PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Beam and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Insurance. The district court erred in finding there were no
issues common to the parties' legal and equitable claim, and plaintiff had
a Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury on the common issue of what
the terms of the parties' intended contract were; the court also erred in
treating the jury's verdict as merely advisory under Fed. R. Civ. P. 39
insofar as this issue was concerned; however the errors doe not
necessitate reversal of the court's order granting post-verdict judgment to
defendant as the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury's verdict
for plaintiff, and the district court did not err in reforming the insurance
policy.