DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

121786P.pdf   04/26/2013  Smith Flooring  v.  Pennsylvania Lumbermens Mutual
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1786
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Beam and Gruender, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Insurance. The district court erred in finding there were no issues common to the parties' legal and equitable claim, and plaintiff had a Seventh Amendment right to trial by jury on the common issue of what the terms of the parties' intended contract were; the court also erred in treating the jury's verdict as merely advisory under Fed. R. Civ. P. 39 insofar as this issue was concerned; however the errors doe not necessitate reversal of the court's order granting post-verdict judgment to defendant as the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury's verdict for plaintiff, and the district court did not err in reforming the insurance policy.