DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

121970P.pdf   03/26/2013  Universal Cooperatives, Inc.  v.  AAC Flying Service, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-1970
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and
   Wollman, Circuit Judge]
Civil case. In an action brought to recover attorneys' fees from third- party crop-dusters following Universal's successful defense of an action by farmers seeking damages arising for off-target aerial application of an herbicide it had manufactured, the district court did not err in dismissing the action for failure to state a claim; with respect to Universal's negligence claim, the defendant crop-dusters did not owe any duty to Universal; further, their alleged conduct failed to fit within the scope of unconscionable trade practices; finally, the Arkansas Supreme Court recently rejected any cause of action against a third-party for attorneys' fees incurred in earlier litigation against another party and, in this case, there is no duty running from the third party to plaintiff which would support such a cause of action, and the district court did not err in dismissing Universal's claims based on the third-party-litigation exception to the American Rule and Restatement (Second) of Torts section 914(2).