122508P.pdf   04/15/2015  Bank of America  v.  Gary Peterson
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2508
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Bye and Colloton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Truth in Lending Act. On remand from the Supreme court for 
   reconsideration in light of Jesinoski v. Countrywide Home Loans, 135 S. 
   Ct. 790 (2015). For the court's prior opinion in the case, see Peterson v. 
   Bank of America, N.A., 746 F.3d 357 (8th Cir. 2014). In light of the 
   Jesinoski opinion, the court vacates that portion of the judgment that 
   granted Bank of America summary judgment on the Petersons' claim for 
   rescission, reinstates that portion of the judgment that vacated the grant 
   of summary judgment to Bank of America on the Peterson's counterclaim for 
   statutory damages and remands the matter to the district court for further 
   proceedings. 
  
122508P.pdf   03/21/2014  Bank of America  v.  Gary Peterson
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2508
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Bye and Colloton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Truth in Lending Act. Because defendants notified Bank of 
   America of their intent to rescind but failed to file a lawsuit within the 
   three-year limitations period, the district court did not err in finding 
   their right of rescission had expired and that their rescission claim was 
   time barred under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1635(f); however, the fact that the 
   defendants' rescission claim failed as a matter of law under Section 
   1635(f) does not mandate the conclusion that their failure-to-rescind 
   counterclaim for statutory damages necessarily fails or is time-barred, 
   and the district court erred in granting the bank summary judgment on this 
   claim.