DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

122663P.pdf   08/05/2013  Ricardo Acosta  v.  Anne Marie Acosta
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2663
                          and No:  12-2791
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
[PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Bye and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Hague Convention. No error in admitting testimony from defendant's expert witness regarding factors indicating that returning the couple's children to Peru would subject them to a high risk of harm as the testimony was not generic, had a factual basis and was subjected to cross-examination; district court did not err in finding the children would be subject to a grave risk of harm if they were returned to Peru with plaintiff, nor did it abuse its discretion in refusing to order their return; the burden is on the moving party to show that conditions or "undertakings" could be imposed to protect the children upon their return, and plaintiff failed to do so