DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

122829P.pdf   06/26/2013  InCompass IT, Inc.  v.  XO Communications Services
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2829
                          and No:  12-2868
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Smith, Author, with Wollman and Murphy, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil Case - Diversity. In action asserting promisory-estoppel claim, 
   district court did not err in striking jury demand: The nature of the 
   right asserted sounds in equity, not law, as the claim asserted was an 
   exchange of oral promises which implicated the statute of frauds and the 
   nature of the remedy included an imprecise measure of damages, including 
   reliance damages, which are equitable in nature.