122910P.pdf   03/14/2016  National Parks Conservation  v.  EPA
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2910
                          and No:  12-3481
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Environmental Protection Administration   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Bye, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Civil case - Environmental law. Petitions challenging the EPA's approval 
   of the Minnesota Regional Haze State Implementation Plan denied; the EPA's 
   explanation that the "Transport Rule" is better than source-specific "Best 
   Available Retrofit Technology (BART)" had a rational basis and its 
   reliance on the Transport Rule was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of 
   discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law; the EPA did not err in 
   approving the reasonable progress goals in Minnesota's Plan as it was 
   acting rationally within its sphere of expertise in approving the goals. 
   Judge Bye, concurring in the result. 
  
122910P.pdf   01/21/2016  National Parks Conservation  v.  EPA
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-2910
                          and No:  12-3481
   Petition for Review of an Order of the Environmental Protection Administration   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge,and Bye, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Petition for Review - Order of the Environmental Protection Agency. 
   Petitions for review of the EPA's June 12, 2012 Minnesota Regional Haze 
   State Implementation Plan denied; the EPA's approval of Transport Rule 
   allowances as a better alternative to source-specific Best Available 
   Retrofit Technology was not arbitrary,capricious, an abuse of discretion 
   or otherwise not in accordance with law; challenge to the EPA's approval 
   reasonable-progress determinations rejected. Judge Bye, concurring in the 
   result.