DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

123200P.pdf   01/07/2014  John Schedin  v.  Ortho-McNeil-Janssen
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3200
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Bye and Melloy, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Civil Procedure. For the court's prior opinion in the case, 
   See In Re Levaquin Prods. Liab. Litig., 700 F.3d 1161 (8th Cir. 2012). 
   District court did not err in denying defendant's motion seeking relief 
   under Rule 60(b)(2) and (3) as defendant failed to show the alleged 
   misrepresentations or newly discovered evidence "would probably have 
   produced a different result."