DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

123498P.pdf   06/13/2013  The Doe Run Resources Corp.  v.  Lexington Insurance Company
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3498
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Gruender, Circuit Judge, and Wimes, 
   District Judge]
Civil case - Insurance. In a declaratory judgment action to determine whether the insurer had a duty to defend Doe Run in two lawsuits seeking damages from operation of Doe Run's waste pile known as the "Leadwood Pile," the district court correctly determined that the insurance policy's pollution exclusions unambiguously applied to claims that Doe Run tortiously released pollutants into the environment and thereby barred a duty to defend in one of the suits; however, the second suit included allegations not found in the other action - that Doe Run distributed the chat and tailings into the community for use on roads and in buildings and children's sandboxes - and these allegations are not based on the inadvertent release of pollutants; this claim, that plaintiffs were injured by distribution of toxic materials, potentially fell within the policies' coverage and created a duty to defend; additionally, the complaint in this action also included claims that Doe Run created an attractive nuisance by leaving the Leadwood Pile open and available to the general public, an allegation which was not unambiguously barred by the pollution exclusions.