DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
123498P.pdf 06/13/2013 The Doe Run Resources Corp. v. Lexington Insurance Company
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-3498
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Gruender, Circuit Judge, and Wimes,
District Judge]
Civil case - Insurance. In a declaratory judgment action
to determine whether the insurer had a duty to defend Doe Run in two
lawsuits seeking damages from operation of Doe Run's waste pile known as the
"Leadwood Pile," the district court correctly determined that the insurance
policy's pollution exclusions unambiguously applied to claims that Doe Run
tortiously released pollutants into the environment and thereby barred a
duty to defend in one of the suits; however, the second suit included
allegations not found in the other action - that Doe Run distributed the
chat and tailings into the community for use on roads and in buildings and
children's sandboxes - and these allegations are not based on the
inadvertent release of pollutants; this claim, that plaintiffs were injured
by distribution of toxic materials, potentially fell within the policies'
coverage and created a duty to defend; additionally, the complaint in this
action also included claims that Doe Run created an attractive nuisance by
leaving the Leadwood Pile open and available to the general public, an
allegation which was not unambiguously barred by the pollution exclusions.