DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

123526P.pdf   07/23/2014  Gary Reece  v.  Bank of New York Mellon
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3526
                          and No:  13-1245
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
[PUBLISHED] [Riley, Author, with Wollman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges Civil case - Civil Procedure.The one-year limit for removing cases to federal court under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1446(c)(1)is inapplicable to this case based on 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1453(b), and defendant was not required to remove the class action within one year of plaintiff's original complaint; the court cannot conclude that diversity jurisdiction was proper based solely on an allegation that plaintiff was a resident of Arkansas; however, plaintiff's submission that he was a citizen of Arkansas when the case was commenced and when it was removed amended the pleadings to satisfy the diversity question; because the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000, the only named plaintiff was a citizen of Arkansas and no named defendant was, this action falls within the federal courts' diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1332(a); under this court's decision in Rivera v. JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Johnson, 719 F.3d 1010 (8th Cir. 2013), the district court did not err in dismissing this action; however, the district court erred in awarding costs to defendant since defendant failed to file the verifying affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1924.