DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

123543P.pdf   08/26/2013  United States  v.  Joey Loesel
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3543
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Colloton and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Sentencing. District court did not err in imposing an 
   enhancement under Guidelines Sec. 2D1.1(b)(13) for creating a risk of harm 
   to human life or the environment; no error in attributing to defendant 
   pseudoephedrine purchased by his girlfriend as the purchases were 
   reasonably foreseeable to him given the couple's joint efforts and her 
   role in the conspiracy; district court did not err in considering 
   information from defendant's proffer as the plea agreement permitted use 
   of the information to rebut any factual position defendant took at 
   sentencing.