DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

123625P.pdf   02/20/2014  Dave Thomas  v.  United Steelworkers Local 1938
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3625
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Gruender and Beam, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - labor. Decision to abandon all but defamation and breach of union constitution claims in response to motion for summary judgment did not divest the district court of federal jurisdiction. District court did not abuse its discretion in exercising supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims. Because genuine disputes of material fact exist, the grant of summary judgment on Thomas's defamation claim under Minnesota law is reversed. Although some of Malek's statements involve subjective view or opinion, other statements were capable of being proven false and were sufficiently inaccurate to create a dispute as to their truth. Statements were also not subject to a qualified privilege, as the investigation of one incident was not the proper occasion to make statements about prior behavior. The failure to investigate prior complaints before making disparaging statements prevented the statements from being based on reasonable or probable cause.