DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
123776P.pdf 06/11/2014 Robert Aaron Peterson v. Officer Michael Kopp
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-3776
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Bright, Circuit
Judge]
Civil case - Civil Rights. Defendant Kopp had at least arguable probable
cause to arrest plaintiff for criminal trespass based on plaintiff's
nonverbal conduct and it was objectively reasonable for defendant to
interpret plaintiff's actions as a refusal to leave a public bus stop; as
a result, defendant was entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's
unlawful arrest claim; force defendant used in securing plaintiff's arrest
was unreasonable; plaintiff failed to show, however, that the injuries he
suffered were more than de minimis, and, under Eighth Circuit law as it
stood at the time of the incident, defendant could reasonably believe his
actions were constitutionally permissible so long as they did not cause
more than de minimis injury; defendant was entitled to qualified immunity
on plaintiff's retaliatory arrest claim because the officer had probable
cause for plaintiff's arrest; however, a reasonable jury could conclude
that defendant pepper-sprayed plaintiff in retaliation for asking for his
badge number and for criticizing the officer's conduct; plaintiff's First
Amendment right to make comments and to obtain this information was
clearly established at the time of the incident; as a result, defendant
was not entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's claim for
retaliatory use of force, and this claim must be remanded; as there is a
federal claim pending, the dismissal of plaintiff's state law claims is
vacated.