DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

123776P.pdf   06/11/2014  Robert Aaron Peterson  v.  Officer Michael Kopp
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3776
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
[PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Bright, Circuit Judge] Civil case - Civil Rights. Defendant Kopp had at least arguable probable cause to arrest plaintiff for criminal trespass based on plaintiff's nonverbal conduct and it was objectively reasonable for defendant to interpret plaintiff's actions as a refusal to leave a public bus stop; as a result, defendant was entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's unlawful arrest claim; force defendant used in securing plaintiff's arrest was unreasonable; plaintiff failed to show, however, that the injuries he suffered were more than de minimis, and, under Eighth Circuit law as it stood at the time of the incident, defendant could reasonably believe his actions were constitutionally permissible so long as they did not cause more than de minimis injury; defendant was entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's retaliatory arrest claim because the officer had probable cause for plaintiff's arrest; however, a reasonable jury could conclude that defendant pepper-sprayed plaintiff in retaliation for asking for his badge number and for criticizing the officer's conduct; plaintiff's First Amendment right to make comments and to obtain this information was clearly established at the time of the incident; as a result, defendant was not entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiff's claim for retaliatory use of force, and this claim must be remanded; as there is a federal claim pending, the dismissal of plaintiff's state law claims is vacated.