DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

123941P.pdf   11/21/2013  Macheca Transport Company  v.  Philadelphia Indemnity Ins.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3941
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Chief Judge Riley and Bright, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Civil Case - diversity. Claim that payment by separate insurer constituted 
   a collateral source and should not have been used to reduce its overall 
   damage award is barred under the law of the case, as the issue was decided 
   in the first appeal and Macheca did not appeal it then. The district court 
   did not err in denying prejudgment interest as to the damage awards for 
   lost business income and for necessary expenses, as those damages were not 
   reasonable ascertainable, but the district court erred in denying the 
   prejudgment interest of the property damage award.