DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
123958P.pdf 08/22/2014 The Phipps Group v. Don Downing & Adam Levitt, etc
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-3958
and No: 12-4045
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Benton, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Common Benefit Trust Fund in MDL cases. The settlement
agreement in the Genetically Modified Rice Litigation, by which the Phipps
Group agreed to be bound, resolved that a percentage of payments due to
clients of Phipps would be allocated to the Common Benefit Trust Fund in
accordance with the district court's 2010 order in the case, and Phipps
waived its challenge to the creation of the Fund and to the order that
Phipps and its clients must contribute to the Fund; the procedures the
court used in making its fee awards were sufficiently thorough and
Phipps's challenge to the procedures and the court's use of summaries and
affidavits prepared by Lead Counsel and other common benefit attorneys is
rejected; court's award of fees was substantively reasonable; by adopting
the Special Master's analysis, the court fulfilled its responsibility to
provide a concise but clear explanation of its rationale for the award;
the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Phipps's
request for a benefit award; on Lead Counsel's cross-appeal, the district
court did not err in determining that it lacked jurisdiction to order
holdbacks from state plaintiffs' recoveries since the state court
plaintiffs neither agreed to be part of the federal MDL nor participated
in the MDL settlement agreement.