DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

123958P.pdf   08/22/2014  The Phipps Group  v.  Don Downing & Adam Levitt, etc
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  12-3958
                          and No:  12-4045
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Loken and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Common Benefit Trust Fund in MDL cases. The settlement agreement in the Genetically Modified Rice Litigation, by which the Phipps Group agreed to be bound, resolved that a percentage of payments due to clients of Phipps would be allocated to the Common Benefit Trust Fund in accordance with the district court's 2010 order in the case, and Phipps waived its challenge to the creation of the Fund and to the order that Phipps and its clients must contribute to the Fund; the procedures the court used in making its fee awards were sufficiently thorough and Phipps's challenge to the procedures and the court's use of summaries and affidavits prepared by Lead Counsel and other common benefit attorneys is rejected; court's award of fees was substantively reasonable; by adopting the Special Master's analysis, the court fulfilled its responsibility to provide a concise but clear explanation of its rationale for the award; the district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Phipps's request for a benefit award; on Lead Counsel's cross-appeal, the district court did not err in determining that it lacked jurisdiction to order holdbacks from state plaintiffs' recoveries since the state court plaintiffs neither agreed to be part of the federal MDL nor participated in the MDL settlement agreement.