DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
124049P.pdf 02/11/2014 Loftness Specialized Farm v. Terry Twiestmeyer
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 12-4049
U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Beam and Shepherd, Circuit Judges]
Civil Case - contract. The district court erred in construing the breach
of the non-compete provision of the non-disclosure agreement as a claim
for the tort of misappropriation of trade secrets and confidential
information. The district court, on remand, should consider whether the
non-compete clause was violated in the first instance. The claim regarding
the breach of the May 2008 Agreement fails because the oral extension is
unenforceable under the statute of frauds, the non-disclosure agreement
did not qualify as a writing to extend the terms of the May 2008
agreement, and there was no implied-in-fact contract created. Thus, the
grant of summary judgment on this claim is affirmed. The district court's
dismissal of the unjust enrichment claim is affirmed, as the remedy is
unavailable in light of the controlling contracts.