131167P.pdf   03/10/2014  1-800-411-Pain Referral  v.  Richard Tollefson, D.C.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1167
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Melloy, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Kelly, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Civil case - Civil rights. In action alleging amendments to Minnesota's 
   No-Fault Automobile Insurance Act, Minn. Stat. Sections 65B.41-47, 
   violated the First Amendment, the district court did not err in denying 
   plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction barring enforcement of the 
   Act; in an action to enjoin enforcement of a validly enacted statutes, the 
   plaintiffs must establish as a threshold matter that they are likely to 
   prevail on the merits; the district court did not err in determining that 
   plaintiffs' radio ads referencing possible entitlement of up to $40,000 in 
   injury and lost wage benefits were inherently misleading; plaintiffs' TV 
   ads depicting actors playing police officers and EMTs speaking to the 
   audience and telling viewers to call the service immediately after an 
   accident were misleading; section of the Act mandating that any 
   advertising for medical treatment eligible for coverage under the Act be 
   undertaken only by or at the direction of a health care provider was 
   constitutional; disclosure provisions in the Act were constitutional.