131176P.pdf   09/03/2015  United States  v.  Dennys Rodriguez
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1176
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Colloton and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. On remand from the Supreme Court. Rodriguez 
   v. United States, 135 S.Ct. 1609 (2015). For this court's prior opinion in 
   the matter, see United States v. Rodriguez, 741 F.3d 905 (8th Cir. 2014). 
   The Supreme Court granted certiorari in this case to decide whether police 
   routinely may extend an otherwise-completed traffic stop, absent 
   reasonable suspicion, in order to conduct a dog sniff and held that a 
   police stop exceeding the time needed to handle the matter for which the 
   stop was made violated the Constitution's shield against unreasonable 
   seizures; here, the officers acted in good faith reliance on existing 
   Circuit precedent and the search, which was made in objectively reasonable 
   reliance on binding circuit precedent, was not subject to the exclusionary 
   rule; as a result, the evidence seized was admissible, and defendant's 
   conviction is affirmed. 
  
131176P.pdf   01/31/2014  United States  v.  Dennys Rodriguez
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1176
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Colloton and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal law. The district court did not err in denying 
   defendant's motion to suppress drugs seized from his car, as a brief 
   seven- or eight-minute delay in deploying a drug dog was a de minimus 
   intrusion on defendant's personal liberty and did not unreasonably prolong 
   the traffic stop.