DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

131190P.pdf   02/25/2014  Charles Yang  v.  Tom Roy
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1190
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - Minneapolis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Kelly, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge,and Melloy, Circuit 
   Judge] 
   Prisoner case - habeas. State court's decision to limit Yang's 
   cross-examination of cooperating witnesses regarding possible sentence 
   reductions they might receive based on their testimony against him was not 
   contrary to, nor an unreasonable application of, clearly established 
   Supreme Court precedent; the witnesses had not yet been sentenced and any 
   testimony regarding a possible percentage reduction would have been 
   speculative; even if it was error to limit the questioning, Yang has 
   failed to show prejudice.