131206P.pdf   03/25/2014  Joan Roe  v.  St. Louis University
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1206
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
   [PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Loken and Colloton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Title IX and torts. In action by female student athlete 
   alleging the University was deliberately indifferent to her rape in 
   violation of Title IX, on this record the district court did not err in 
   granting the University's motion for summary judgment as plaintiff failed 
   to demonstrate a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the school 
   acted with deliberate indifference in respect to her rape and its 
   aftermath; with respect to plaintiff's claim that the University was 
   negligent in its treatment and supervision following a back injury she 
   suffered in field hockey practice, she failed to present evidence to show 
   the school breached a duty to conform to a standard of care; the court did 
   not err in granting the school summary judgment on plaintiff's 
   misrepresentation claims as she failed to show falsity, reliance or 
   materiality with respect to claims regarding the quality of the school's 
   athletic program and its support staff and facilities; the district court 
   did not err in granting the University summary judgment on plaintiff's 
   breach of contract claim based, in part, on her signed National Letter of 
   Intent; alumni connections were not a reasonable basis for questioning a 
   judge's impartiality and the district court did not err in denying 
   plaintiff's motion to recuse; claims of due process violations with 
   respect to discovery and motion practice denied.