DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

131445P.pdf   04/03/2014  Athena Bachtel  v.  TASER International, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1445
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Hannibal   
[PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Loken and Smith, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Products liability. Plaintiff's decedent died of cardiac arrest after being tasered by defendant's product, and she brought this action alleging failure to warn and defective design; regarding plaintiff's claim for strict liabilty for failure to warn, the district court did not abuse its discretion by excluding plaintiff's expert's testimony on the issue of whether a different or additional warning would have altered the actions of the officer who shot the device; even if an adequate warning had appeared in defendant's training materials, the record established that the officer would not have heeded it, and the presumption that the officer would have read and heeded a warning as to the cardiac danger of firing the device at a subject's chest was unavailable as a matter of law; as a result, plaintiff's failure to establish that an additional warning would have altered the officer's actions is necessarily fatal to her negligence claim for failure to warn, and defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's failure to warn claims; plaintiff failed to present evidence that the device was unreasonably dangerous as designed and defendant was entitled to summary judgment on her defective design claim.