DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
131445P.pdf 04/03/2014 Athena Bachtel v. TASER International, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 13-1445
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - Hannibal
[PUBLISHED] [Murphy, Author, with Loken and Smith, Circuit Judges]
Civil case - Products liability. Plaintiff's decedent died of cardiac
arrest after being tasered by defendant's product, and she brought this
action alleging failure to warn and defective design; regarding
plaintiff's claim for strict liabilty for failure to warn, the district
court did not abuse its discretion by excluding plaintiff's expert's
testimony on the issue of whether a different or additional warning would
have altered the actions of the officer who shot the device; even if an
adequate warning had appeared in defendant's training materials, the
record established that the officer would not have heeded it, and the
presumption that the officer would have read and heeded a warning as to
the cardiac danger of firing the device at a subject's chest was
unavailable as a matter of law; as a result, plaintiff's failure to
establish that an additional warning would have altered the officer's
actions is necessarily fatal to her negligence claim for failure to warn,
and defendant was entitled to summary judgment on plaintiff's failure to
warn claims; plaintiff failed to present evidence that the device was
unreasonably dangerous as designed and defendant was entitled to summary
judgment on her defective design claim.