DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

131515P.pdf   03/04/2014  United States  v.  Chaim Marcus
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1515
   U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Bright and Smith, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Forfeiture. District court did not err in striking Marcus's 
   Amended Verified Claim based on its conclusion that the claim did not 
   comply with the requirements of Supplemental Rule G(5)(a)(iii), which 
   requires that on asserting an interest in cash as a bailee, the claimant 
   must identify the bailor; with respect to that portion of the cash Marcus 
   claimed to own, the district court erred in striking the claim as the 
   claim was sufficient to establish his standing under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 
   983(d)(6)(A) and his failure to answer special interrogatories did not 
   provide a basis for striking the claim.