DISCLAIMER: Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
131560P.pdf 04/24/2014 Cecil Edwards, Jr. v. Karl Byrd
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 13-1560
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Benton and Kelly, Circuit Judges]
Prisoner case - Civil rights. In an action alleging defendants used
excessive force against plaintiffs, pretrial detainees at the Faulkner
County, Arkansas jail, the district court did not err in denying the
defendants' motions for summary judgment based on qualified immunity
because the facts, as found by the district court for the purposes of the
summary judgment motion, would support a claim of excessive force in
violation of the Eighth Amendment; the facts as found would also support
plaintiffs' claim that defendants failed to protect the plaintiffs from
harm in violation of the Due Process Clause; however, defendant Boyd, the
sheriff, was not present at the jail on the date of the event in question,
and he was entitled to qualified immunity on plaintiffs'
individual-capacity excessive-force and failure-to-protect claims.