DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

131566P.pdf   07/01/2014  Nadine Hemminghaus  v.  State of Missouri
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1566
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis   
[PUBLISHED] [Chief Judge Riley, Author, with Wollman and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - Family Medical Leave Act. Grant of summary judgment to Missouri circuit judge in in FMLA claim brought by judge's court reporter is affirmed, as court reporter is not an eligible employee under the FMLA because she is a personal staff member of a public elective office holder. In the context of 29 U.S.C. sec. 203(e), the state circuit judge is a public elective office holder and court reporter was "selected by the judge to be a member of his personal staff." In a claim of First Amendment retaliation, district court correctly granted summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity to the judge. The district court correctly determined that the speech related to a matter of public concern in part, but also concluded there was sufficient evidence of disruption to the workplace. Given the court reporter's position and the weight of the judge's interest in impartiality and public confidence in the courts, it was reasonable for the judge to be concerned about any potential conflict of interest, and it was not clearly established that the termination of an insubordinate employee who compromised the propriety and efficiency of his courtroom could violate her right to free speech.