DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

131607P.pdf   03/21/2014  Fernando Espinoza  v.  United States
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1607
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa - Sioux City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bye, Author, with Murphy and Smith, Circuit Judges] 
   Prisoner case - Habeas. District court did not err in rejecting Espinoza's 
   claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to imposition of 
   an enhancement under Section 851 as the error in the 851 notice was a 
   clerical error naming the wrong district court for his prior conviction 
   and Espinoza still had reasonable notice of the government's intent to 
   rely on a particular conviction; as the notice was adequate, counsel was 
   not ineffective in failing to object to it.