131688P.pdf   10/07/2014  Hudson Specialty Insurance Co  v.  Brash Tygr, LLC
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1688
                          and No:  13-1742
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City   
   [PUBLISHED] [Loken, Author, with Bye and Colloton, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Insurance. The district court erred when it determined that 
   the driver of a non-company owned vehicle was acting in the course of 
   defendant's business when he struck a pedestrian as he was not acting on 
   the defendant's business as a matter of law, and the insurer was entitled 
   to summary judgment on the coverage issue; defendants' cross-appeal is an 
   alternative argument in support of the district court's decision and is an 
   unnecessary complication of the case; the cross-appeal is dismissed; in 
   any event, the district court did not err in determining that defendants 
   were entitled to summary judgment based on a collateral estoppel theory. 
   Judge Bye, concurring in part and dissenting in part.