DISCLAIMER: The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.
131882P.pdf 04/03/2014 United States v. Christopher Emly
U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 13-1882
U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo
[PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Loken, Circuit
Judge]
Criminal case - Criminal law. Defendant's actions in copying child
pornography images onto three different devices did not permit the
government to charge him with three separate counts of possession under 18
U.S.C. Sec. 2252(a)(4)(B) and the three counts were multiplicitous;
however, the multiplicitous counts of possession did not taint the jury's
deliberations where the jury was given instructions to consider each
charge separately and where the evidence of defendant's guilt was strong;
the proper remedy, in light of defendant's concurrent sentences, is to
direct the district court to vacate the convictions on the multiplicitous
counts, and a new trial is not required; guilty verdicts on both receipt
and the lesser included offense of possession are not plainly inconsistent
or ambiguous verdicts; further, the court eliminated any possibility of
ambiguity by polling the jury and avoided any threat of double counting by
entering judgment only on the greater offense of receipt of child
pornography; jury instruction on receipt did not constructively amend the
indictment.