DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

131882P.pdf   04/03/2014  United States  v.  Christopher Emly
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1882
   U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota - Fargo   
[PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Riley, Chief Judge, and Loken, Circuit Judge] Criminal case - Criminal law. Defendant's actions in copying child pornography images onto three different devices did not permit the government to charge him with three separate counts of possession under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 2252(a)(4)(B) and the three counts were multiplicitous; however, the multiplicitous counts of possession did not taint the jury's deliberations where the jury was given instructions to consider each charge separately and where the evidence of defendant's guilt was strong; the proper remedy, in light of defendant's concurrent sentences, is to direct the district court to vacate the convictions on the multiplicitous counts, and a new trial is not required; guilty verdicts on both receipt and the lesser included offense of possession are not plainly inconsistent or ambiguous verdicts; further, the court eliminated any possibility of ambiguity by polling the jury and avoided any threat of double counting by entering judgment only on the greater offense of receipt of child pornography; jury instruction on receipt did not constructively amend the indictment.