131887P.pdf   03/27/2014  United States  v.  Cesar Sevilla-Acosta
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-1887
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Smith and Beam, Circuit Judges] 
   Criminal case - Criminal case. Defendant voluntarily stipulated that he 
   lived at a residence used for marijuana distribution, and he waived his 
   right to argue on appeal that the stipulation violated his Fifth and Sixth 
   Amendment rights; while the district court's ruling on the admissibility 
   of a co-conspirator's statement in the presence of the jury was error, the 
   court took prompt curative action, including explaining its error and 
   giving a curative instruction, and it did not abuse its discretion by 
   denying defendant's motion for a mistrial; government did not improperly 
   vouch for its witnesses during its closing argument.