DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

132061P.pdf   02/04/2014  Harleysville Worchester Ins.  v.  Fred Ensminger
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-2061
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs   
   [PUBLISHED] [Wollman, Author, with Loken and Kelly, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case - Insurance. The district court did not err in applying 
   Arkansas's doctrine of mutual mistake to reform an insurance policy where 
   the policy inadvertently failed to include a law enforcement exclusion, as 
   the evidence showed both the insured and the insurer intended to enter 
   into a contract which excluded such coverage; defendant's laches argument 
   was without merit.