132156P.pdf   08/28/2014  Jane Doe  v.  Sammy Hagar
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-2156
   U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Waterloo   
   [PUBLISHED] [Bright, Author, with Loken and Gruender, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case. In action alleging Sammy Hagar libeled plaintiff in his 
   autobiograhpy Red: My Uncensored Life in Rock, the district court erred in 
   granting Hagar's motion for summary judgment as Hagar's statements were 
   defamatory as a matter of law, and there were jury issues concerning 
   whether plaintiff had satisfied the publication element of her libel per 
   se claim and whether the challenged statements were "of and concerning 
   her;" further, with respect to Hagar's defense that the statements were 
   substantially true, plaintiff had produced sufficient evidence to raise a 
   jury question on the issue; the district court also erred in granting 
   summary judgment on plaintiff's false light invasion of privacy claim as 
   she satisfied the "publicity" element of a false light claim and raised a 
   jury issue as to whether the challenged statements were sufficiently 
   publicized; district court did not err in granting Hagar summary judgment 
   on plaintiff's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim; 
   plaintiff raised a jury issue as to whether Hagar's comments breached the 
   parties' confidentiality agreement, and the court erred in granting Hagar 
   summary judgment on her breach-of-contract claim; no error in granting 
   Hagar summary judgment on plaintiff's breach of the covenant of good faith 
   and fair dealing claims.