DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

132356P.pdf   06/25/2014  United States  v.  Brian Graves
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-2356
   U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota - St. Paul   
[PUBLISHED] [Shepherd, Author, with Colloton and Kelly, Circuit Judges] Criminal case - Criminal law. District court did not err in admitting, as an excited utterance under Rule 803(2), statements the victim gave police thirty minutes after the incident; the lapse of time between the incident and the statements was not so long as to render them inadmissible, and the other factors - the victim's state of distress, the fact that the statements were made in response to a general inquiry and the nature of the incident - all established that the statements bore a guarantee of trustworthiness and were not subject to reflection and deliberation.