DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

132763P.pdf   11/19/2014  Kenneth Wivell  v.  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-2763
   U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield   
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Smith and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Civil Case - diversity. Because there was no reasonable basis in fact and law to assert claims against trustee, joinder of trustee as defendant was fraudulent and the district court properly denied the motion to remand for lack of diversity jurisdiction. Dismissal of claims against trustee, as a fraudulently-joined defendant, should have been without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1), and judgment should be so modified. Dismissal of claims against Wells Fargo were proper. Missouri would not extend lulling theory to a situation where deed of trust prohibits oral agreements. Fraudulent misrepresentation claims were not plead with sufficient particularity and reliance on oral representations was unreasonable. In light of Missouri Supreme Court decisions, denial of claims of violations of MMPA are vacated and remanded for further proceedings. Negligence and negligent misrepresentation claims fail. 132763P.pdf 06/25/2014 Kenneth Wivell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. U.S. Court of Appeals Case No: 13-2763 U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield
[PUBLISHED] [Gruender, Author, with Smith and Colloton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Foreclosures. District court did not err in denying plaintiffs' motion to remand to state court as the joinder of defendant Kozeny was fraudulent since there was no basis in law or fact for either of plaintiffs' claims against Kozeny; claims against Kozeny should have been dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the district court's dismissal of the claims is so modified; district court did not err in dismissing plaintiffs' claims against defendant Wells Fargo for wrongful foreclosure, fraudulent misrepresentation, violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act, negligence and negligent misrepresentation for failure to state a claim.