DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

132830P.pdf   08/08/2014  ASARCO  v.  Union Pacific Railroad Company
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-2830
   U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha   
   [PUBLISHED] [Chief Judge Riley, Author, with Beam and Smith, Circuit 
   Judges] 
   Civil Case - CERCLA. Union Pacific's settlement with the EPA and Asarco's 
   failure to object during the comment period or the district court's 
   approval of the consent decree, protects Union Pacific from Asarco''s 
   breach of contract and contribution claims and district court did not err 
   in dismissing the collateral action. The district court correctly 
   concluded Union Pacific did not waive the contribution protection under 
   state law or breach the tolling agreement. Estoppel claim was not 
   presented to the district court and thus that claim is forfeited.