DISCLAIMER:  The following unofficial case summaries are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

133371P.pdf   08/06/2015  Troy Ellison  v.  Donna Lesher
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-3371
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
[PUBLISHED] [Colloton, Author, with Wollman and Benton, Circuit Judges] Civil case - Civil rights. In action alleging the defendant officers unlawfully entered the home of plaintiff's 67-year-old father and used excessive force when they shot and killed him, the district court did not err in denying defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity on Count I of the complaint which alleged unlawful entry; under the facts outlined by the district court, defendants entered because they thought the deceased was being "mouthy" and that belief did not provide an exception to the warrant requirement for entering the residence; the court would not look to facts not outlined by the district court as that would be beyond the proper scope of an interlocutory appeal on the issue of qualified immunity; with respect to the district court's finding that defendant Lesher was not entitled to qualified immunity on Count II's allegations of excessive force, Lesher frames her argument that she was entitled to qualified immunity on a set of facts not assumed by the district court; while she may be able to prove at trial that the deceased was wielding a cane in a threatening manner, the court must accept for the purposes of its decision that he was not wielding the cane when shot; under the facts outlined by the district court officer Lesher would have been on notice that use of deadly force would not be reasonable, and Lesher was not entitled to qualified immunity; given the de minimus level of injuries the deceased suffered before the shooting, defendant McCrillis is entitled to qualified immunity on the excessive force claim against him and defendant Lesher was entitled qualified immunity on plaintiff's claim she used excessive non-lethal force before the shooting.