DISCLAIMER:  Any unofficial case summaries below are prepared by the clerk's office
                        as a courtesy to the reader. They are not part of the opinion of the court.

133443P.pdf   10/03/2014  Ruby Hiser  v.  XTO Energy, Inc.
   U.S. Court of Appeals Case No:  13-3443
   U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock   
   [PUBLISHED] [Benton, Author, with Melloy and Shepherd, Circuit Judges] 
   Civil case. Even assuming the jury's fracking and earthquake discussions 
   included any extraneous matters under Rule 606(b)(2)(A), defendant has not 
   shown a reasonable possibility that the discussions prejudiced it or 
   altered the verdict, and the district court did not err in denying 
   defendant's motion for a new trial; the district court did not abuse its 
   discretion by refusing to subpoena the jury foreman.